Utilities Need to Step Up Their Climate Efforts

This past July was the warmest July in the 175 years that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA) has been keeping records. It was also the 14th consecutive month of record-high global temperatures, which itself is a record.

Commercial heat pumps in NYC.

We’ve jumped from 11 billion tons of carbon dioxide per year in 1960s to 36.6 billion tons in 2023. The world is now in territory not seen for more than 3 million years. At that time the global surface temperature was 4.5-7.2°F warmer than during pre-industrial era. Human civilization simply cannot survive in a climate like this.

We’re clearly walking along a knife’s edge. That’s what makes the complacency — some might say willful opposition — of the utilities so infuriating.

This is not to say utility efforts to help customers make energy-saving improvements haven’t made a difference, because they have. But it clearly hasn’t been enough. Utilities could do far more to help homes and businesses decarbonize.

We recently saw a good example in the NYS commercial building sector of what can happen when a utility makes a serious effort to facilitate electrification. NYSEG launched an economic development heat pump incentive for gas-constrained areas in April 2023 as part of a larger statewide effort rolled out by the NYS Public Service Commission. The pilot program provided up to $200,000 per project to transition off gas-powered technologies. Together with federal incentives, it suddenly made sense financially to install heat pumps in nonresidential buildings in Ithaca.

In short order, ten major weatherization and electrification projects involving commercial buildings got underway. Retail stores, restaurants, offices, and houses of worship, as well as cultural and performance spaces, took advantage of the decarbonization program, amounting to a total clean energy investment of over $1.9 million, with $1.4 million from state and federal incentives. The energy upgrades represent nearly 680 metric tons of annual avoided greenhouse gas emissions based on EPA estimates. Five of the ten buildings were members of the Ithaca 2030 District.

The program expired after only several months and once again the effort to electrify commercial buildings didn’t pencil out. Not surprisingly, the stream of projects slowed to a trickle.

A new report from the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) takes a close look at utility energy-saving initiatives, arguing that utilities need to step up their efforts. The report provides recommendations for state legislators and utility regulators aimed at expanding the scale and scope of utility energy efficiency programs to better address the growing climate crisis.

In particular, the study makes the crucial point that “climate goals, not just energy savings, should drive utilities’ efficiency efforts.” It notes that the majority of current energy efficiency programs focus too narrowly on energy savings and, as a result, often miss important decarbonization opportunities. Without a doubt, state regulators and utitlity executives should rethink their approach to energy efficiency; this report offers a new path forward.

How Serious is NY about Its Climate Goals?

There’s something seriously unnerving about the casual way in which Gov. Hochul has acknowledged that New York will probably not meet its 2030 climate targets. The pathbreaking Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) calls for the state to obtain 70 percent of its electricity from renewable energy by 2030.

joint draft report issued in July by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) and the Public Service Commission (PSC) indicated that the 70 percent renewables target will not be achieved before 2033.

State State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins. NY Senate Photo licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Audit Reveals Flaws
A few weeks after this report, State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli released a detailed audit criticizing the PSC and NYSERDA for inadequate planning and the use of outdated data. In particular, it said that the PSC had failed to address “all current and emerging issues that could significantly increase electricity demand and lower projected generation.”

Perhaps most disturbing was the audit’s finding that the PSC had overlooked the need to calculate the costs of the transition to renewables or to identify how to cover those costs beyond the tried and true method of dumping them on ratepayers. 

How Committed is the State?
Together these two reports raise major questions about the actual commitment of the state to implementing the 2019 CLCPA. The governor’s reaction to these findings? Oh well, it won’t hurt if we let things slide for a few years. Not surprisingly, state Republican leaders and the business community have taken advantage of the leadership vacuum to attack the climate law and press Hochul to abandon it.

How is it possible for this failure of leadership to take hold during the same summer that global temperatures have been setting new records month after month? In fact, not only was this past July the warmest on record, but it was also the 14th consecutive month of record-high global temperatures. Does anyone see a pattern here?

Cornell professor Robert Howarth, a member of the state’s Climate Action Council, certainly does. The council passed a plan to implement the CLCPA in December 2022, and Howarth is on the front line defending it. “I am appalled at this pushback against the CLCPA by business interests pushing their short-sighted agenda,” Howarth said in an interview with WaterFront. “Climate change is very real. The consequences of climate disruption (floods, droughts, fires, crop failures) are becoming increasing obvious to all.”

Eddie Bautista, executive director of the New York City Environmental Justice Alliance, strongly agrees that stronger leadership is necessary. “In just five short years, we’ve gone from being visionary leaders to not being able to implement our own laws. It’s just insane,” he said recently.

The governor’s reversal on congestion pricing in New York City has environmentalists wondering whether this is part of a larger plan to back away from other elements of the state climate action agenda such as the cap-and-invest plan that would price greenhouse gas emissions. At the very least, it looks likely that the administration will blow past its self-imposed deadline to launch the program in early 2025.

A Simple Step
One step that Hochul could take to restore some degree of confidence in her commitment to climate action would be to sign the Climate Change Superfund Act that is currently sitting on her desk after being passed in June by both the General Assembly and State Senate. This legislation would require oil and gas companies to pay a total of $3 billion a year for 25 years to cover the cost of the climate damage they have inflicted on the state.

The governor has not yet signaled her intention, which leaves a lot of climate activists worried, although some think she might just be waiting until after the election to do so. The pressure on her has been growing throughout the summer and will only continue to increase this fall.

Fossil Free Media, together with the Sunrise Movement, has launched a national billboard campaign in California, New York, Arizona, and Philadelphia, with plans to expand to Florida and Louisiana in September. as part of the effort to build support for the principle that polluters should pay for the mess they have made.

The Make Polluters Pay campaign seeks to hold the fossil fuel industry accountable through legislation, lawsuits, and public pressure. This is exactly the kind of national attention that Hochul wants to avoid, but she better get used to it. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) and Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) just announced their intention to introduce federal Polluter Pays bills in Congress. Things are definitely heating up – stay tuned.