Envisioning a Low-Carbon Future
I was invited recently to contribute an article to the Tompkins Weekly Signs of Sustainability series, organized by Sustainable Tompkins. It appeared in the February 28, 2011 issue. Here it is (with hyperlinks added):
Listening to the rhetoric of oil, coal and gas company executives such as the Koch brothers, you would think they were champions of limited government and the free market. In fact, however, the fossil fuel industry is one of the most subsidized businesses in the U.S. and its burgeoning profits would shrink dramatically without federal support. According to the Environmental Law Institute, the U.S. government provided the industry with $72 billion between 2002 and 2008. About $54 billion of that total was permanent tax credits for oil, coal and natural gas producers. In contrast, during that same period, the renewable energy industry received $29 billion, most of it also in the form of federal tax credits. The difference is that none of these tax credits is permanent.
On top of these enormous subsidies for oil, coal and gas, there are staggering external costs incurred as a result of our dependence on fossil fuels. These include the expense of defending strategic oil interests in the Middle East and elsewhere, the damage to air quality and our health and the impact of greenhouse gas emissions on the climate. Then there is the looming crisis of peak oil and our growing competitive disadvantage as other countries such as China rush to embrace clean energy technologies. Taking all of these factors into account, it’s hard not to believe that relying solely on fossil fuel energy is foolhardy.
The Pentagon knows this. At a recent White House summit on clean energy, I spoke with several Army officers from Fort Carson in Colorado and it was clear they were hard at work making the transition to renewables and energy efficiency. No one had to remind them of the tremendous sacrifice in lives and dollars sustained in military operations as a result of our dependence on foreign oil. And no one had to convince them that climate change was a rising national security risk; they had their own hard data about the impact of global warming on political and economic stability around the world.
In light of these developments, it makes perfect sense that President Obama is seeking to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars that the government gives to oil and gas companies. As he put it in a speech at Penn State earlier this month, “It’s time to stop subsidizing yesterday’s energy; it’s time to invest in tomorrow’s.” The redirected dollars would go toward the development of wind, solar and geothermal power, energy efficiency technology and building upgrades.
In his Penn State remarks Obama called on Americans to take up the challenge of energy innovation. The Tompkins County Climate Protection Initiative (TCCPI) has been doing just that since June 2008. A coalition of community leaders from the business, financial, nonprofit, local government and education sectors, TCCPI has brought together many of the key organizations and institutions in Tompkins County to explore ways we can build a low carbon future and achieve the county’s target of an 80 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
In particular, TCCPI has worked closely with Cornell Cooperative Extension, Tompkins County, to launch the Tompkins Energy Conservation Corps (TECC), consisting primarily of students from Cornell, Ithaca College and TC3. Pursuing an innovative approach to the social marketing of residential energy retrofits, Energy Corps members carry out energy assessments on the homes of Tompkins County leaders to underscore the importance of energy conservation and its impact on the local economy. In addition, TECC conducts outreach efforts through community blower-door workshops, youth activities, employer brown bag lunch events and an evolving marketing campaign.
It is efforts like these in countless communities across the U.S. that will make it possible for us to reengage as citizens in a democratic society and take our country in a different direction, one that steps back from the brink of ecological disaster and moves towards a world in which the balance between the natural world and human civilization is restored and a more just and equitable future for our children and grandchildren is made possible. In the end, it will be people, not technology, who make the difference.